Evidence Hub

Drug-induced insulin autoimmune syndrome: a clinico-epidemiological analysis integrating pharmacovigilance data and case series

Yu X, Li M, Liao Y, Xie Y, Xu J, Long Y, Xiang S

Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Background: Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) is a rare immune-mediated hypoglycemic disorder predominantly triggered by pharmacological agents. Despite the established links to thiol-containing drugs, emerging non-thiol triggers and significant geographical reporting biases limit comprehensive risk profiling. This study integrated pharmacovigilance data and published evidence to establish the first systematic epidemiological and pharmacological profile of drug-induced IAS.

Methods: We analysed 228 IAS cases from the FDA AE Reporting System (FAERS; 2004-Q2 2024) and a systematic review of 263 published cases (1980-2024). Multimodal disproportionality analysis-including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN)-identified drug-induced adverse event signals. Associations were stratified into a three-tier evidence framework (Levels 1-3) based on methodological concordance, case counts, and strength of the supporting literature.

Results: Fifty-eight agents showed potential IAS associations, including 12 novel pharmacovigilance signals (e.g., bevacizumab, sitagliptin, amlodipine, and olmesartan). Thiol-containing drugs exhibit the strongest signals (PRR > 200; e.g., captopril, methimazole, and clopidogrel). Level 1 evidence (highest confidence) implicated the use of clopidogrel, captopril, omeprazole, and methimazole. IAS was predominantly affected in older…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free