Evidence Hub

Renal Effects of Empagliflozin Alone or in Combination with Semaglutide in Albuminuric Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

F. Persson, Suvanjaa Sivalingam, Victor S. Wasehuus, V. R. Curovic, T. Hansen, P. Rossing

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2023

19 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

. Background: Kidney gene expression has been shown to be associated with kidney function in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) patients by cross-sectional transcriptomics studies. However, how the renal transcriptome correlates to disease progression has not been established due to the paucity of longitudinal studies. We hypothesized that certain intra-kidney transcriptomic patterns associated with progressive DKD may elucidate disease drivers and predictive factors. Methods: RNA-seq data from micro-dissected kidney biopsies and post-biopsy clinical data were available for 19 DKD patients. Patients were stratified into rapid and non-rapid progressors based on the following: eGFR decline more than ≤ -5 ml/min/year, CKD stage advancement, ≥ 30% UACR increase, nephrotic range albuminuria, and a composite outcome of kidney failure/ ≥ 40% eGFR loss. Gene signatures associated with rapid DKD progression were identified by differential expression (DEA), weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) and pathway enrichment analyses. Results: We identified 265 statistically significant ( Padj < 0.05) rapid progression-associated genes in the glomerular and tubulointerstitial compartments across all disease progression definitions through DEA. With WGCNA, 1 module in the glomeruli and 7 in the tubulointerstitium were found to be significantly correlated to eGFR slope ( P < 0.05). The rapid progression-associated genes in the glomeruli were enriched for pathways linked to cell adhesion by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free