Evidence Hub

Case Report: Acral vasculitis induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: a case series and literature review

Rivet V, Guillon B, Sibaud V, Dion J, Pastissier A, Delavigne K, Cougoul P, Rauzy O et al.

Frontiers in oncology, 2025

15 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) may cause various immune- related Adverse Events (irAEs). Of these events, vascular involvement is still considered an uncommon irAEs and generally concerns large or medium vessels. Acral small-vessel vasculitis can lead to severe digital necrosis.

Case presentation: Herein, we present three cases after treatment with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab for lung adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma, respectively. Two patients had a Raynaud's-like syndrome. All of them presented with digital ischemia of both hands and with severe acral necrosis in the first case. Management consisted in ICI discontinuation, high-dose steroids, and vasodilator agents with good evolution in the three cases. No rechallenge of ICI has been attempted.

Discussion: We found 12 other cases in the literature review to build a cohort of 15 patients, mostly male with a median age of 60 years. Lung cancer and melanoma are the most common tumors. The most frequently used ICI was pembrolizumab. The median time to onset was 8 weeks. The main clinical presentation was a distal and painful necrosis mostly on thehands with bilateral involvement. Toes were affected in only two cases. All cases were severe features with grade ≥ 3. Eleven patients were treated with steroids and vasodilator agents. ICI was discontinued permanently in all patients.

Conclusion: ICI-induced small-vessel vasculitis can lead to severe digital…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free