Evidence Hub

JAK Inhibitors for Treatment of SAPHO Syndrome: A Systematic Review of 72 Cases

Fazeli P, Bahramian S, Farahmand K, Ghoshouni H, Farahmand Y, Soheili A, Bagheri L, Memari H et al.

ACR open rheumatology, 2025

72 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Objective: Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome usually involves bones, joints, and skin. Due to a lack of known pathogenesis and clinical trials, there is no standard treatment of SAPHO syndrome. Because none of the current treatments have a high efficacy and the risk of relapse is high, new treatment options for SAPHO syndrome are necessary. JAK inhibitors (JAK-I) are a group of small-molecule drugs with a wide range of effects on inflammatory and autoimmune pathways.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using medical subject headings terms or keywords related to JAK-I and SAPHO syndrome through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase until September 8, 2024. The inclusion criteria included a patient diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome who received at least one JAK-I. We excluded reviews and animal studies.

Results: Of 287 initially researched articles, we included 34 articles. These 34 articles represent 72 patients with a mean age of 39.36 years. Of these, 56 (78%) were female. All patients had bone or joint involvement, and 64 patients had skin involvement. Seventy patients (97.2%) had received at least one treatment before using JAK-I. All patients received just one JAK-I. Of these, 54 (75%) received tofacitinib, 15 (20.8%) received baricitinib, and 3 (4.2%) received upadacitinib. All patients except one (98.6%) showed good to complete response. Ten patients (13.9%) showed a clinical adverse effect. All were taking…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free