Evidence Hub

Successful treatment of pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial meningitis/ventriculitis by combined intravenous and intrathecal colistin-tigecycline administration: a case series

Andreas Theofanopoulos, Dionysia Fermeli, D. Vekios, Aristeidis Bizos, M. Marangos, C. Constantoyannis, V. Panagiotopoulos, S. Assimakopoulos

Le infezioni in medicina, 2023

8 citations

Abstract

Background

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of combined intraventricular and intravenous co-administration of colistin and tigecycline in the management of pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii meningitis/ventriculitis.

Methods

In this case series we report 3 patients with healthcare-associated ventriculitis/meningitis caused by pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii that were treated with combined colistin and tigecycline administration through both intraventricular and intravenous routes.

Results

All patients were administered colistin intraventricularly at a dose of 250.000 IU q.d. and intravenously at 9 million IU loading dose, followed after 12 hours by maintenance dose of 4.5 million IU every 12 hours and tigecycline intraventricularly at a dose of 10 mg b.i.d. and intravenously at 200 mg loading dose followed after 12 hours by 100 mg every 12 hours. In patients with a calculated creatinine clearance of less than 60 ml/min, according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula, the maintenance dose of colistin was reduced based on a modified formula. All patients had a favourable clinical and microbiological response with evidence of CSF sterilization.

Conclusions

Taking advantage of the synergistic action of combined colistin and tigecycline through administration both intraventricularly and intravenously may be a promising salvage option for critically ill patients with pan-drug resistant A. baumannii CNS infection.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free