Evidence Hub

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Crystalglobulin-Induced Nephropathy: A Case Series

Samih H. Nasr, Satoru Kudose, A. Valeri, A. Kashkouli, Samar Said, D. Santoriello, Glen S. Markowitz, Lihong Bu et al.

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2024

16 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Crystalglobulinemia is a rare syndrome characterized by intravascular crystallization of monoclonal immunoglobulins (MIgs). Data on kidney involvement are limited to case reports. This series characterizes the clinicopathologic spectrum of crystalglobulin-induced nephropathy (CIN).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen CIN cases were identified from the nephropathology archives of Mayo Clinic and Columbia University. CIN was defined by intravascular (extracellular) MIg crystals visible by light (LM) and electron microscopy (EM).

FINDINGS

Among the cases, 68% were male and 65% were Caucasian (median age 56 years). Most patients presented with severe AKI (median creatinine 3.5 mg/dL), hematuria, and mild proteinuria (median 1.1 g). Common extrarenal manifestations were constitutional (67%), cutaneous (56%), and rheumatologic (50%). Fifty percent of cases had hypocomplementemia. The hematologic disorders were monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) (72%), lymphoma (17%), or myeloma (11%), with 65% of these disorders discovered concomitantly with CIN. All patients had MIg identified on SPEP/SIF (IgGκ in 65%). The sFLC ratio was outside the renal range in 40%, and bone marrow biopsy detected the responsible clone in 67%. On LM, crystals involved glomeruli (100%) and vessels (47%), often with an inflammatory reaction (89%) and fibrin (58%). All cases exhibited crystal substructures (mostly paracrystalline) by EM.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free