Evidence Hub

P494 Efficacy and safety of Upadacitinib in moderate to severe paediatric Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in a tertiary Paediatric IBD (PIBD) centre – A case series

E. Kontaki, A. Merchant, E. Gaynor, F. Kiparissi

Journal of Crohn's & Colitis, 2024

12 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients 18 years and older with the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Although there is promising data for its use in adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), limited data are currently available on its use in paediatric IBD. We present our experience in this case series of patients ≤ 18 years on Upadacitinib.

We identified patients under the age of ≤ 18 years, started on Upadacitinib for the indication of IBD. Data on demographics, disease subtype, duration on Upadacitinib, number of biologic failures, tofacitinib use, concomitant biologic use, adverse events and clinical remission were gathered.

12 patients with paediatric IBD (median age at Upadacitinib start 15.5 years, range 13.9 to 17.8 years, 8 (67%) males, were identified. 7 patients had Crohn’s disease, 3 patients had ulcerative colitis and 2 patients had IBD unclassified. 4 patients (33%) were diagnosed under the age of 6 years with early onset IBD (EOIBD), 1 was 3.5 years old, 1 was 4 years old and 2 were 5 years old. 11/12 (92%) patients had failed 3 or more biologics. Upadacitinib was used as monotherapy in all patients and previous biologic treatments were stopped. 1 patient with a partial response to tofacitinib was switched to Upadacitinib. All patients had active disease at commencement of Upadacitinib. All 12 (100%) patients were started on 45 mg of Upadacitinib. 8/12 (67%) patients have been followed up…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free