Evidence Hub

Case Report: Non-reactive vasoreactivity testing in a patient with patent ductus arteriosus with pulmonary hypertension: is there still a way to turn things around?

Siagian SN, Panjaitan EH, Nugroho PP

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025

Abstract

Background: Recent guidelines recommend patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure in adults based on hemodynamic criteria, such as pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and flow ratio (Qp:Qs). However, additional parameters like acute vasoreactivity testing (AVT) and closure testing, though lacking extensive data, may assist in identifying patients eligible for closure. We present the case of an adult patient with PDA and pulmonary hypertension (PH) whosuccessfully underwent transcatheter device closure guided by AVT and closure testing.

Case presentation: A 35-year-old female presented with a two-year history of shortness of breath, cyanosis, and peripheral edema. She had been diagnosed with PDA at birth but did not undergo ligation due to parental refusal, leading to a 33-year loss of follow-up. Echocardiography revealed a bidirectional shunt through the PDA. Following cardiac catheterization (Qp:Qs 1.38, PVR: 21.5 WU) with AVT, the patient was diagnosed with PDA, PH with low flow, high resistance, and non-reactive to vasoreactivity test. She was prescribed sildenafil and discharged. After one year, the patient reported symptom improvement, with repeat catheterization showing a slight reduction in Qp:Qs (1.25) and PVR (16.38 WU), though values remained above the guideline cut-off for closure. However, the patient was then reactive to AVT, so we decided to perform device closure and observed the patient for 10 min before releasing the device. The patient was stable following the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free