Evidence Hub

Clinical and Immunological Impact of JAK Inhibition in Concurrent Down Syndrome and STAT1 Gain of Function

Blanco-Lobo P, Gilabert-Prieto P, de Felipe B, Moreno-Fuentes D, Guisado Hernández P, Ortiz-Ramírez A, Mensa-Vilaró A, Aróstegui JI et al.

Journal of clinical immunology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Down syndrome (DS) and STAT1 gain-of-function (GOF) share clinical and molecular features, including persistent inflammation. We aimed to investigate whether the coexistence of DS and a STAT1 GOF mutation in a patient synergistically enhances interferon (IFN) signaling and exacerbates inflammatory responses, posing additional management challenges. Two patients (P1 and P2) were studied: P1, with DS and a heterozygous p.P326S STAT1 variant, and P2, with the STAT1 p.P326S variant only. Individuals with isolated DS or STAT1 GOF served as controls. IFN receptor subunits (IFNγR1/R2 and IFNαR1/R2) and responses to IFNα/γ stimulation were analyzed using flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Whole blood type I IFN signature and serum cytokines were evaluated using NanoString and Luminex assays. P1 experienced recurrent infections, chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary hypertension. P2 presented with esophageal candidiasis, dysphagia, and stenosis. The p.P326S variant led to increased STAT1/pSTAT1 levels in response to IFNα/γ. Both patients showed significant clinical improvement with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor ruxolitinib. However, P1's key biomarkers (STAT1 levels, IFN signature, TNFα, IL-6) remained altered, indicating persistent inflammation despite clinical improvement. This first report of a STAT1 GOF variant in DS provides a unique "experiment of nature", offering insights into the interplay between trisomy 21 and STAT1-mediated immune…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free