Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes of Minimized Hydrocortisone Dosage of 100 Mg/Day on Lower Occurrence of Hyperglycemia in Septic Shock Patients

Kanchana Ngaosuwan, Kanit Ounchokdee, T. Chalermchai

Shock, 2017

80 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Background: The current international guideline recommended 200 mg/day of hydrocortisone intravenously to treat septic shock. However, a subsequent study on cortisol metabolism actually showed an increase in cortisol level during sepsis. Hence, the smaller hydrocortisone dose of 100 mg/day might be sufficient and reduce steroid-associated complications. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of minimized hydrocortisone dose of 100 mg to the currently recommended dose in the treatment of septic shock patients. Methods: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial included 80 septic shock patients with hemodynamic instability despite fluid and vasopressive therapy. Participants were divided equally into two groups to treat with 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day of hydrocortisone, then stepwise down titrated and discontinued on day 8. The outcome of interest was the hyperglycemic rate. Vital status, time to shock reversal, superinfection and gastrointestinal bleeding rates were also compared. Results: Patients with 100 mg hydrocortisone had significantly lower hyperglycemic rate compared with 200 mg, 63.9% versus 86.5% (the adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.41, P = 0.002). Time to shock reversal was shorter in patients with 100 mg hydrocortisone, 2 days vs. 4 days, P = 0.031. The 28-day mortality rate when adjusted for Simplified Acute Physiology Score II showed no significant difference (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.37–1.24, P = 0.209). The reinfection…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free