Evidence Hub

The effects of semaglutide, empagliflozin and their combination on the kidney sodium signal from magnetic resonance imaging: A prespecified, secondary analysis from a randomized, clinical trial

S. Gullaksen, L. Vernstrøm, S. S. Sørensen, S. Ringgaard, C. Laustsen, H. Birn, K. Funck, P. L. Poulsen et al.

Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2024

65 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of treatment with semaglutide and empagliflozin on the cortico-medullary sodium gradient (MCR; medulla/cortex ratio), urine sodium/creatinine ratio (UNACR), and estimated plasma volume (ePV) and to compare the MCR between persons with and without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Using the 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (23Na-MRI) technique, we investigated the effects of 32 weeks of treatment with semaglutide, empagliflozin or their combination on MCR in 65 participants with type 2 diabetes and high risk of cardiovascular disease. The participants were recruited from a randomized, controlled interventional trial and further characterized by UNACR and ePV. In addition, in a cross-sectional design, we compared MCR by 23Na-MRI in 12 persons with type 2 diabetes and 17 matched controls. Data from the interventional trial were analyzed using a single, multivariate linear mixed model strategy for repeated measurements. Data from the cross-sectional study were analyzed by fitting a linear regression model adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, semaglutide, but not empagliflozin, significantly decreased the MCR (-9 %, 95%CI (-18, -0.06)%, p = 0.035 and -0.05 %, 95%CI(-0.15, 0.05)%, p = 0.319, respectively). The UNACR decreased in the semaglutide group(-35 %, 95 % CI(-52, -14) %, p = 0.003) but not in the empagliflozin group (7 %, 95 % CI(-21, 44)%, p = 0.657), whereas the ePV decreased in the combination group. The MCR was not different between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 65 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free