Evidence Hub

Additional Use of a Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Chronic Systolic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis

Xiaojing Wu, Te Yang, Qi Zhou, Shuangfei Li, Lan Ji Huang

European Journal of Heart Failure, 2013

40 citations

Abstract

AIMS: Increased indiscriminate use of pulmonary artery hypertension-targeted drugs has been observed in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to heart failure. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the chronic effects of using phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors to treat patients with PH secondary to chronic systolic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to October 2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PDE5 inhibitor treatments in PH patients secondary to chronic heart failure. Six RCTs involving 206 chronic systolic heart failure patients with PH complications were included. Sildenafil was used in all trials. Sildenafil treatment resulted in fewer hospital admissions compared with the placebo treatment (3.15% vs. 12.20%; risk ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.77). Various haemodynamic parameters were improved with additional sildenafil treatment, including reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure [weighted mean difference (WMD) -5.71 mmHg, P<0.05] and pulmonary vascular resistance (WMD -81.5 dynes/cm(-5), P<0.00001), increased LVEF (WMD 3.95%, P<0.01), and unchanged heart rate and blood pressure. The exercise capacity improved (oxygen consumption at peak exercise, WMD 3.20 mL/min(-1)/kg(-1), P<0.00001; ventilation to CO2 production slope, WMD -5.89, P<0.00001), and the clinical symptoms were relieved based on the breathlessness (WMD 7.72, P<0.00001), fatigue (WMD 2.28,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free