Evidence Hub

1719-P: Efficacy and Safety of Anagliptin Added to Metformin and Empagliflozin 25 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial with 28-Week Open-Label Extension

Jun-Sung Moon, Soojin Park, Jong Chul Won, Jun Goo Kang, K. Han, J. Yu, Cheol-Young Park

Diabetes, 2026

200 participants

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled with metformin and empagliflozin require additional therapies to improve glycemic control. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, as add-on therapy to metformin and empagliflozin.

Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, we enrolled patients with T2DM inadequately controlled (HbA1c 7.0-11.0%) on metformin (≥1000 mg/day) and empagliflozin (25 mg/day). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive anagliptin (100 mg twice daily) or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by a 28-week open-label extension. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24.

Results: Of 200 randomized patients (n=97 anagliptin, n=100 placebo; mean age 58.6 years; baseline HbA1c 7.76%), 197 completed primary analysis. At week 24, HbA1c decreased 0.83% in anagliptin group versus 0.03% in placebo (difference -0.80%; 95% CI -0.95 to -0.64; P<0.0001). More patients achieved HbA1c ≤7.0% (60.8% vs. 18.0%; P<0.0001) and ≤6.5% (25.8% vs. 3.0%; P<0.0001). Fasting plasma glucose decreased 11.1 mg/dL in anagliptin versus increased 5.75 mg/dL in placebo (P<0.0001). HOMA-β improved: +10.45 versus -6.02 (P=0.0003). During open-label extension, placebo-treated patients switching to anagliptin achieved similar HbA1c at week 52 (anagliptin: 7.14% vs. original placebo: 7.17%; P=0.60), while anagliptin group…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free