Evidence Hub

Performance of the Sensititre YeastOne assay compared with EUCAST E.Def 9.4 against Fusarium clinical isolates: focus on voriconazole and amphotericin B

Pao-Yu Chen, Un-In Wu, Wang-Da Liu, Yu-Tsung Huang, Yee-Chun Chen

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 2026

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Despite the global emergence of Fusarium infections, data validating commercial antifungal susceptibility testing against these moulds remain scarce. We evaluated the performance and optimal reading time of the Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) assay against Fusarium clinical isolates compared with the EUCAST reference method. Methods This two-centre study (2011–2023) analysed 123 Fusarium isolates identified via two-step molecular sequencing. In vitro susceptibilities to voriconazole and amphotericin B were evaluated using SYO (24 h and 48 h readouts) versus the EUCAST E.Def 9.4 broth microdilution reference method (48 h readout). Essential agreement (EA) was defined as a ±2 log2 dilution difference; >90% was acceptable. Results Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC) dominated the cohort (85.3%), predominantly F. keratoplasticum and F. pseudensiforme. EUCAST testing revealed high MIC50/MIC90 values of voriconazole (>16/>16 mg/L) and amphotericin B (2/16 mg/L). While 65% (80/123) of isolates displayed positivity by SYO at 24 h, median spectrophotometric growth was significantly greater at 48 h than at 24 h [0.37 (IQR 0.315–0.403) versus 0.18 (0.151–0.206)]. At 48 h, EA approached acceptability for voriconazole (92.7%) and amphotericin B (89.4%). Voriconazole categorical agreement (CA) among FSSC was 88.6% and reached 96.9% for F. pseudensiforme. For amphotericin B, SYO MICs clustered around 4–8 mg/L, yielding 100% very major error for F. keratoplasticum and F.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free