Evidence Hub

A facile synthesis of 1,3,4-oxadiazole-based carbamothioate molecules: Antiseizure potential, EEG evaluation and in-silico docking studies

Nasır Rasool, Zainib Razzaq, Samreen Gul Khan, Sana Javaid, Naheed Akhtar, Sadaf Mahmood, Jørn B. Christensen, Ataf Ali Altaf et al.

Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2023

21 citations

Abstract

In present work, a series of novel structural hybrids of 1,3,4-oxadiazole and carbamothioate was designed by chemical modification of 2-(4-isobutylphenyl)propanoic acid. Target compounds (7a-f) were synthesized in significant yields (84–88 %) by coupling compound (4) with different electrophiles under different reaction conditions. The structures of oxadiazole based carbamothionate derivatives were confirmed by spectroscopic (FTIR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR) and physiochemical methods. During in-vivo experimentation, all synthesized compounds were tested through 6 Hz (32 mA) and PTZ (80 mg/kg) mouse seizure models. The 7b and 7c showed significant outcomes (P < 0.05) in terms of seizure severity, protection and mortality. The behavioural outcomes of PTZ tests were further strengthened with video-electroencephalogram (vEEG) findings in which EEGs were analyzed for epileptic spikes to understand the impact of 7b and 7c treatment on these ictal activities. The 7b was found most efficient in reducing the seizure spiking activity in brains of PTZ-treated mice while both 7b and 7c significantly reduced overall PTZ-induced seizure severity. The molecular docking studies also predicted the BBB permeability, reduced binding energies and good compound interaction with GABAA receptors and SV2A protein. Therefore, the observed pharmacological outcomes might be attributed to the GABAA agonistic and SV2A modulating potential of these oxadiazole-carbamothioate hybrid compounds.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in animal and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free