Evidence Hub

Risk of Incident Dementia According to Metabolic Health and Obesity Status in Late Life: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Ji-yeon Lee, K. Han, Eugene Han, Gyuri Kim, Hanna Cho, K. J. Kim, Byung-wan Lee, E. Kang et al.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2019

12,296,863 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT

The risk for dementia among subjects who are obese with normal metabolic profiles, or called metabolically healthy obese (MHO), remains uninvestigated.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between late-life metabolic health and obesity status and risk of incident dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The National Health Insurance System, Republic of Korea.

PATIENTS

A total of 12,296,863 adults >50 years old who underwent health examinations from 2009 to 2012 without baseline history of dementia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incident overall dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD).

RESULTS

Among subjects ≥60 years old, 363,932 (6.4%) developed dementia during a median follow-up of 65 months (interquartile range 51 to 74 months). The MHO group showed the lowest incidence of overall dementia [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.86] and AD (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.88), but not VaD, compared with the metabolically healthy nonobese group. All components of metabolic syndrome except obesity significantly elevated the risk of dementia, and these associations were more pronounced in VaD. In particular, being underweight dramatically increased the risk of dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

The MHO phenotype in late life demonstrated lower risk of overall dementia and AD but not VaD. Additional studies in other populations are warranted to elucidate current results and may predict individuals most at risk for developing dementia.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12,296,863 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free