Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing High Dose Amoxicillin Versus Tetracycline Based Quadruple Therapy as Second-line Treatment for Resistant Helicobacter Pylori Infection
Abstract
No trial has examined the the efficacy of high dose amoxicillin based quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. The study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of 14-day high dose amoxicillin-based quadruple regiment with classical quadruple regiment for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori.
Conditions: Helicobacter Pylori Treatment Failure.
Primary outcome: Eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori.
Enrollment: 312 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 312 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
- A new aging measure captures morbidity and mortality risk across diverse subpopulations from NHANES IV: A cohort study
- Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study
- Are noise and air pollution related to the incidence of dementia? A cohort study in London, England
- Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children — a nationwide cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.