Real-world Evidence versus Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical Research Based on Electronic Medical Records
Abstract
Real-world evidence (RWE) and randomized control trial (RCT) data are considered mutually complementary. However, compared with RCT, the outcomes of RWE continue to be assigned lower credibility. It must be emphasized that RWE research is a real-world practice that does not need to be executed as RCT research for it to be reliable. The advantages and disadvantages of RWE must be discerned clearly, and then the proper protocol can be planned from the beginning of the research to secure as many samples as possible. Attention must be paid to privacy protection. Moreover, bias can be reduced meaningfully by reducing the number of dropouts through detailed and meticulous data quality management. RCT research, characterized as having the highest reliability, and RWE research, which reflects the actual clinical aspects, can have a mutually supplementary relationship. Indeed, once this is proven, the two could comprise the most powerful evidence-based research method in medicine.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study
- Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis: a cohort study
- Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study
- Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study
- Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank
- Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.