Evidence Hub

Design and rationale of the EMPagliflozin after Aortic Valve Replacement (EMPAVR) study: A randomized clinical trial

Sørensen LM, Reinert MS, Raja AA, de Backer O, Bieliauskas G, Schou M, Jensen J, Møller ELR et al.

American heart journal, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and dysfunction secondary to aortic stenosis (AS) are key components of the disease's underlying pathophysiology. Previous trials suggest that up to 1/3 of patients do not benefit symptomatically after aortic valve replacement (AVR), which could be explained by insufficient LV remodeling. Sodium‒glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in heart failure (HF) and have been shown to improve LV remodeling (change in LV mass).

METHODS

The EMPAVR study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded trial comparing the effect of empagliflozin to placebo in patients with severe and symptomatic AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The primary outcome for the EMPAVR trial is the difference in LV mass indexed to body surface area (measured by cardiac CT) from pre-AVR to 6 months post-AVR. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 180 days of treatment.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, the EMPAVR study is the first placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of SGLT2 inhibition in patients following TAVI because of AS. The EMPAVR study has the potential to pave the way for treatment of the LV in valvular heart disease and may help patients worldwide and expand our understanding of aortic stenosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The EMPAVR study was registered in December 2024 (Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT06171802) before enrollment of the first patient.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free