Evidence Hub

Safety and Short-Term Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and End-Stage Renal Disease

Lin DS, Lo HY, Yang CW, Wu CC

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2026

17 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the safety of empagliflozin in escalating doses among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis who also have heart failure.

Methods: This single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation study enrolled patients with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis with heart failure (reduced or preserved ejection fraction) from June to September 2023. Patients sequentially received empagliflozin at doses of 5 mg, 10 mg, and 25 mg daily for 4 weeks per dose, alongside standard care. Pre-dialysis vital signs, electrocardiograms, complete blood counts, and biochemical profiles were monitored weekly. Dose-dependent changes were assessed using linear mixed models.

Results: A total of 17 patients participated, without significant adverse events. Empagliflozin treatment was associated with a significant shortening of QRS duration (regression coefficient - 3.35 ms, P < 0.001), stable QT intervals, increased serum calcium (regression coefficient 0.02 mg/dL, P = 0.004), and decreased bicarbonate levels (regression coefficient - 0.27 mmol/L, P = 0.019). Additionally, diastolic blood pressures measured pre-dialysis significantly increased over time (regression coefficient 1.70 mmHg, P = 0.025).

Conclusion: Empagliflozin at doses of 5 mg, 10 mg, and 25 mg per day, administered sequentially for 4 weeks each, demonstrated a favorable safety profile in patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Further studies are warranted to explore…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free