Evidence Hub

Digital implementation strategy to increase SGLT2 inhibitor uptake in heart failure: Study design of EMAIL-HF

Elmegaard M, Køber L, Ersbøll MK, Lange T, Tuxen CD, Mouridsen MR, Lauridsen TK, Thune JJ et al.

ESC heart failure, 2025

5,996 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Aims: The EMAIL-HF trial aims to evaluate whether a digital guideline implementation strategy can increase and accelerate initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods and results: EMAIL-HF is a pragmatic, registry-based, randomized controlled trial including patients with a diagnosis of HF within the last 10 years, residing in the Capital Region of Denmark and the municipality of Roskilde (~2 million inhabitants). A total of 5996 eligible patients not already treated with SGLT2 inhibitors were identified from nationwide health registries and randomized 1:1 to either receive a digital letter providing information on SGLT2 inhibitors with an invitation for evaluation (intervention group: 2979 patients), or to usual care without the letter (control group: 3017 patients). The median age was 73 years (intervention) vs. 74 years (control), with 67.4% and 66.5% males, respectively. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy within 6 months after randomization. The secondary outcome is a composite of time to first HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality. Additional exploratory outcomes include adherence, clinical events, healthcare utilization and subgroup analyses. Full baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes will be reported after completion of event accrual.

Conclusions: EMAIL-HF will determine whether a population-wide digital strategy can increase and accelerate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 5,996 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free