Evidence Hub

The natural course of bone mineral density in transgender youth before medical treatment; a cross sectional study

Maria Anna Theodora Catharina van der Loos, L. S. Boogers, D. Klink, M. den Heijer, C. Wiepjes, S. Hannema

European Journal of Endocrinology, 2024

556 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bone mineral density (BMD) Z-scores decrease during puberty suppression in transgender youth. Assessment of treatment impact has been based on the assumption that without intervention, BMD Z-scores remain stable. However, the natural course of BMD in this population is unknown.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans prior to medical intervention were included from 333 individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB), and 556 individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB) aged 12-25 years. The relationship between age and BMD Z-scores of sex assigned at birth was analysed for the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and total-body-less-head (TBLH), adjusted for height SDS, height-adjusted lean mass Z-score, and whole body percentage fat Z-score.

RESULTS

In individuals AMAB, BMD Z-score was negatively associated with age between 12-22 years: LS -0.13/year (95%CI-0.17; -0.10); TH -0.05/year (95%CI-0.08; -0.02); FN -0.06/year (95%CI-0.10; -0.03); TBLH -0.12/year (95%CI-0.15; -0.09). Adjusting for height-adjusted lean mass Z-score attenuated the association at the LS and TBLH and eliminated the association at the TH and FN. BMD Z-scores and age were not associated between 22-25 years. In individuals AFAB, BMD Z-scores were only associated with age at the TBLH (-0.08/year,95%CI-0.12; -0.04) between age 12-20 years.

CONCLUSION

In individuals AMAB aged 12-22 years prior to any treatment, BMD Z-scores inversely…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 556 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free