Evidence Hub

Factors Related to the Etiology of Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Systematic Review

Moreno-Fresco MM, Mizzi S, Munuera-Martínez PV, Távara-Vidalón P

Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2026

14,500 participants

Abstract

Background: The origin of hallux abducto valgus (HAV) is considered to be multifactorial; however, evidence regarding the factors involved in its development is scattered and often contradictory. Understanding the factors that contribute to the onset of HAV is crucial for informing both prevention and clinical management strategies. This review aims to explore the etiological factors associated with the development of HAV. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus. The search included observational studies that investigated etiological or risk factors related to the development of HAV. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists, and the level of evidence was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). Results: A total of 36 observational studies (20 cross-sectional and 16 case-control) were included, involving 14,500 participants, predominantly females. Genetic evidence indicated strong familial aggregation and variants in collagen- and extracellular matrix-related genes as potential hereditary determinants. The most consistent biomechanical factors were first-ray hypermobility, abnormal foot pronation and reduced activity of the abductor hallucis muscle. Additionally, female sex, older age and prolonged use of narrow or inadequate footwear were identified as recurring predictive variables. Overall, the findings support a complex etiological model…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 14,500 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free