Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of balcinrenone and dapagliflozin for CKD: design and baseline characteristics of the MIRO-CKD trial

Mark PB, De Sousa-Amorim E, Eriksson AL, Leonsson-Zachrisson M, Guzman NJ, Miller MT, Jiang Y, Heerspink HJL

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2025

614 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Despite benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) being recommended for treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD), there is still an unmet need for managing renal residual risk. Based on pre-clinical data, balcinrenone is a novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that maintains cardio-renal benefits without increasing hyperkalaemia risk. Use of balcinrenone and dapagliflozin is expected to provide complementary and additive kidney and cardiovascular protection. The MIRO-CKD study tests the hypothesis that balcinrenone with dapagliflozin is superior to dapagliflozin alone in reducing albuminuria in patients with CKD.

Methods: MIRO-CKD is a double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2b study evaluating the efficacy and safety of balcinrenone/dapagliflozin in 300 adults (planned) with CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and serum potassium within normal range. Participants are being randomized 1:1:1 to balcinrenone/dapagliflozin 15 mg/10 mg, 40 mg/10 mg or placebo/dapagliflozin 10 mg for 12 weeks, followed by an 8-week wash-out period to assess off-drug effects. The primary endpoint is the change in log-transformed urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 12. Other outcomes include pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability.

Results: A total of 614 patients were screened and 324 were randomized across 15 countries in Asia, Europe, and North and South America. There were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 614 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free