Evidence Hub

Clinical profile of expanded dengue syndrome in children.

Mahajan V, Singh J, Guglani V

The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2024

178 participants

Abstract

The objective is to study the clinical profile and outcome of expanded dengue syndrome (EDS) in children. We conducted a retrospective cohort study and enrolled consecutive children (1 month to 18 years) who presented with dengue fever for over 1 year. The diagnosis of dengue fever was confirmed by the presence of dengue NS1 antigen and/or dengue IgM positivity. Subsequently, we identified children exhibiting EDS according to the revised World Health Organization guidelines (2011). We compared the clinical and laboratory profiles of children diagnosed with EDS and those without EDS. Of 178 children with dengue fever, 33 (18.5%) had EDS [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.1%-25.0%]. In these 33 children, neurological involvement was the most common manifestation [n = 16/33 (49%, 95% CI: 32%-65%)], namely encephalopathy, febrile seizures and encephalitis, respectively. Gastrointestinal involvement was the second most common [n = 10/33 (30%, 95% CI: 17%-47%)], which included fulminant hepatic failure, acalculous cholecystitis and acute pancreatitis. Renal presentation [n = 7 (21%, 95% CI: 10%-37%)] was limited to acute kidney injury. Children with EDS were significantly anemic and had leukocytosis, hyperkalemia, azotemia, hyperbilirubinemia, raised serum transaminases and fluid-refractory shock than their non-EDS counterparts. Children with EDS had a trend toward higher mortality (P = 0.07) and the survivors had a longer duration of hospital stay (5 days vs. 4 days in non-EDS, P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 178 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free