Evidence Hub

Otolaryngologic sequelae of Ehlers Danlos Syndrome in pediatric patients

Cottone C, Nanu D, Gawel EM, Corbin AF, Clausen S, Carr M

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2024

6,440 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As outlined by the NIH, Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a group of hereditary connective tissue disorders characterized by skin hyperelasticity, joint hypermobility, atrophic scarring, and blood vessel fragility, with no otolaryngological criteria for diagnosis. We aimed to compare otolaryngological disorders between children with EDS and those not affected by EDS.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using the US collaborative network within TriNetX. The EDS group was defined by ICD-10 code G47.33, while the non-EDS group excluded any patients with an EDS diagnosis. Cohorts were matched by age, sex, and race using propensity score matching. Pathologies analyzed included hearing loss (ICD-10H90, H91), otitis media (ICD-10H66, H65), allergic rhinitis, acute tonsillitis (ICD-10 J03), sinusitis (ICD-10 J32, J01), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (ICD-10 G47.33). Chi-square and relative risk within a 95 % confidence interval were calculated.

RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 6440 patients (male: N = 2,523, 39.2 %; female: N = 3,893, 60.5 %; unknown: N = 24, 0.37 %) with a mean age of 9.28 years (SD = 4.38). Children with EDS were 2.04 times more likely to be diagnosed with hearing loss, occurring in 286 (4.4 %) EDS children versus 140 (2.1 %) controls (P < 0.001). Children with EDS were 1.6 times more likely to be diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, occurring in 436 (6.8 %) EDS children versus 274 (4.2 %) controls (P < 0.001). Children with EDS…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,440 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free