Evidence Hub

TeleFAST: Pooling Remote Physician Capacity Across Emergency Departments to Improve On-Site Flow and System Resilience

Monteiro MS, Lourenço F, Conceição D, Rafael S, Oliosi E, Santos AR, Bajelan K, Guede-Fernández F et al.

2026

3,677 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) crowding is driven by low-acuity visits that consume physician capacity and lengthen wait times. In Portugal, nearly 40% of ED visits are low-acuity (Manchester Triage System II [MTS II] blue or green). ED demand fluctuates, but conventional fast-track models (FTMs) depend on on-site physician availability, limiting absorption of demand peaks. TeleFAST is a centralised telemedicine FTM that pools remote physician capacity across multiple EDs. Methods A multicentre observational study was conducted across four EDs (CUF Hospital Network, Portugal; November 2024–January 2026), comprising a retrospective cohort comparison of TeleFAST versus standard of care (SoC) among low-acuity adults meeting fast-track eligibility criteria, and a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs) delivering TeleFAST. Outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), resource utilisation, workload variability, and 72-hour and 7-day reattendance. Between-group comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Mixed-effects models adjusted for MTS II presenting flowchart assessed operational outcomes, and logistic regression assessed reattendance. A Resilience Index (RI) was developed to assess demand buffering. Survey analyses included construct scoring, Cronbach's alpha, and correlations among technology acceptance, organisational readiness, and usability constructs. Results A total of 7046 ED visits were analysed (TeleFAST…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 3,677 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free