Evidence Hub

Emotion Regulation in the Daily Lives of Women With and Without Eating Disorders: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

Racine SE, Bicaker E, Miller A, Trolio V, Zhu LY

2026

188 participants

Abstract

Objective: Emotion regulation difficulties are known risk/maintenance factors for eating disorders (EDs). Few studies have investigated use of adaptive/maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in people with EDs, especially using ecologically valid data. This study: 1) compared stressor endorsement and severity, use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and perceived helpfulness of these strategies among women with and without EDs; 2) investigated whether adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategy use and perceived helpfulness predicted engagement in ED behaviors among women with EDs.

Methods:: Participants were 188 women with diverse EDs and 49 women with no ED history. They completed five signal-contingent surveys per day for 14 days that asked about stressors, emotion regulation strategies, purging, and maladaptive exercise. Event-contingent surveys completed after eating assessed binge eating and restriction.

Results:: Compared to women without EDs, women with EDs reported a greater number of stressors, greater stress severity, less adaptive strategy use, more maladaptive strategy use, and less perceived helpfulness from adaptive strategies. Using an adaptive strategy and perceiving it as more helpful were associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent binge eating. Using distraction was associated with future restriction, while perceiving distraction as unhelpful predicted future maladaptive exercise. None of the within-person results…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free