Evidence Hub

Changes in β-Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity During Treatment With Dapagliflozin Alone or in Combination With Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes

Triplitt C, Cersosimo E, Alatrach M, Adams J, Hansis-Diarte A, Baskoy G, Gastaldelli A, Chavez-Velazquez A et al.

Diabetes care, 2025

25 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) alone or with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on β-cell function (BCF) in type 2 diabetes. The hypothesis was that an SGLT2i combined with a GLP-1RA provides superior improvement in BCF than either agent alone.

Research design and methods: Ninety patients underwent a 180-min oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 1) after one drug dose (acute study) (placebo [n = 15], dapagliflozin [n = 25], exenatide [n = 25], and dapagliflozin/exenatide [n = 25]) and 2) after 1 and 4 months of therapy. Corrected Matsuda index (cMI) for urinary glucose loss, insulin secretion, and BCF indices were calculated during OGTT.

Results: In the acute study, mean ± SEM cMI in dapagliflozin (2.29 ± 0.33), exenatide (2.03 ± 0.12), and dapagliflozin/exenatide (2.36 ± 0.14) was higher (P < 0.05) than placebo (1.63 ± 0.36). After 1 and 4 months, cMI remained similarly elevated in exenatide and increased further (P < 0.001) in dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin/exenatide. In the acute study, insulin secretion in dapagliflozin was similar to placebo but higher (P < 0.001 vs. both) in exenatide and dapagliflozin/exenatide. After 1 and 4 months in exenatide and in dapagliflozin/exenatide, insulin secretion remained higher (P < 0.01 vs. both) than dapagliflozin. BCF index in the acute study was 0.40 ± 0.04 in placebo, 62% higher (P < 0.05) in dapagliflozin (0.65 ± 0.10), threefold higher in exenatide (1.17 ±…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free