Evidence Hub

IMPROVE-DiCE, a 2-Part, Open-Label, Phase 2a Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Ninerafaxstat in Patients With Cardiometabolic Syndromes

Hundertmark MJ, Birkhoelzer SM, Portwood C, Siu AG, Matthews V, Lewis AJ, Grist J, Mózes F et al.

Circulation, 2026

21 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: We report IMPROVE-DiCE (Improve Diabetic Cardiac Energetics), a 2-part open-label, phase 2a trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of ninerafaxstat, a novel therapeutic designed to enhance cardiac energetics. Between May and September 2021, part 1 enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity without heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Between January 2023 and June 2024, part 2 enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and HFpEF.

Methods: Forty-two participants received 200 mg ninerafaxstat twice daily (part 1, n=21, 43% women, 72±0.5 years of age, 4-8 weeks; part 2, n=21, 29% women, 71±6 years of age, 12 weeks). Myocardial energetics (phosphocreatine-to-ATP ratio [PCr/ATP], primary outcome) and function (rest and dobutamine stress) were assessed before and after treatment using magnetic resonance imaging, 31P- and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In part 1, hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess in vivo pyruvate dehydrogenase flux (n=9) and plasma metabolomics and proteomics were also performed.

Results: In part 1, in patients with diabetes and obesity but without HFpEF, the heart was characterized by impaired pyruvate dehydrogenase flux, reduced PCr/ATP, triglyceride deposition, and diastolic impairment. Treatment with ninerafaxstat was associated with improved PCr/ATP (+0.39±0.49 [95% CI, 0.16-0.62]; Cohen's d, 0.79; P=0.002) and lower myocardial triglyceride (by 34%, P=0.03). In part…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free