A Phase Ⅱ, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, Positive-controlled, Dose-finding Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of CsA Ophthalmic Gel in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye (ADDE)
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of CsA ophthalmic gel in the treatment of moderate to severe tear deficiency dry eye with different dosage, frequency and concentration, and to preliminarily determine the optimal dosage, frequency and concentration, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the design of follow-up clinical studies.
Conditions: Dry Eye.
Primary outcome: The EDS score at the NO.5 visit was compared with the baseline EDS score (binocular).
Enrollment: 240 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 240 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- The Matrisome: In Silico Definition and In Vivo Characterization by Proteomics of Normal and Tumor Extracellular Matrices
- The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: Its definition, characteristics, and capabilities
- In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling
- In silico prediction of splice-altering single nucleotide variants in the human genome
- In silico clinical trials: how computer simulation will transform the biomedical industry
- In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.