Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Pitolisant (BF2.649) in the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Treated or Not by Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, But Still Complaining of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2020

389 participants

Abstract

The first objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of pitolisant given at 10, 20, or 40 mg per day versus placebo during 12 weeks of the Double Blind period, to treat the Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS) in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) refusing the nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) therapy or treated by nCPAP but still complaining of EDS.

The secondary objectives of the study include assessing the long-term tolerance as well as the maintenance of efficacy of pitolisant given at 10, 20 or 40 mg per day during 39 weeks of Open Label Extension period and further investigating the co-variates or co-medications that affect the pharmacokinetics of pitolisant in the target population.

Conditions: Excessive Daytime Sleepiness, Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Primary outcome: Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS).

Enrollment: 389 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 389 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free