Evidence Hub

Comparison of Semaglutide or Dulaglutide Versus Empagliflozin for Risk for Death and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes : Two Target Trial Emulation Studies

Anum Saeed, Suresh R. Mulukutla, F. Thoma, L. Lemon, A. Koczo, Steven E. Reis, Oscar C. Marroquin, K. Kip

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2025

7,899 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reduction of premature death and adverse cardiovascular outcomes is a key goal in type 2 diabetes management.

OBJECTIVE

To compare mortality and cardiovascular event risks in patients treated with semaglutide versus empagliflozin and, secondarily, dulaglutide versus empagliflozin.

DESIGN

Target trial emulation studies from observational data comparing semaglutide- or dulaglutide-treated patients with propensity score-matched patients treated with empagliflozin.

SETTING

Health care system of 703 academic and community clinical practices.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 45 years or older with type 2 diabetes treated from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2024 with semaglutide, dulaglutide, or empagliflozin.

INTERVENTION

Initial treatment with semaglutide, dulaglutide, or empagliflozin. At baseline, concomitant treatment with other diabetes medication was permitted, excluding other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.

MEASUREMENTS

A composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke was the primary outcome, and secondary composite outcomes included death or MI, MI or stroke, and individual cardiac events.

RESULTS

Patients treated with semaglutide (n = 7899) versus empagliflozin (n = 7899) were followed for a median of 2.2 years; the respective rates of the composite of death, MI, or stroke were 3.7% versus 4.5% at 2 years and 5.9% versus 6.9% at 3 years. Corresponding incidence rates for the composite outcome were…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free