Evidence Hub

Investigating ghrelin and its isoforms in eating disorders: a network meta-analysis

Dani C, Giachetti S, Mura M, Tedesco S, Rossi E, Cassioli E, Tarchi L, Micali N et al.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eating disorders (EDs) are serious psychiatric conditions disorders characterized by impairments in appetite regulation and energy balance. Among the biological factors implicated in their pathophysiology, the orexigenic hormone ghrelin and its isoforms (acyl-ghrelin [AG] and desacyl-ghrelin [DAG]) have been shown to play a key role in appetite regulation and may contribute to the maintenance of disordered eating behaviors.

METHODS

A systematic review of existing literature and meta-analysis were conducted, including 80 studies examining fasting blood levels of ghrelin, AG, and DAG across various ED diagnostic categories and healthy controls (HC), including also individuals with recovered AN (AN-rec). A network meta-analysis (NMA) approach through a multilevel linear mixed-effects meta-regression model was employed to estimate hormone levels, while accounting for covariates such as body mass index (BMI), sex, blood composition and assay type.

RESULTS

Ghrelin levels were significantly elevated in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) when compared to HC, while binge eating disorder (BED) was associated with lower ghrelin levels than individuals with BN and HC. AG and DAG levels were significantly elevated in individuals with AN compared to HC, and confirmed higher in AN-rec if compared to HC. No significant differences in ghrelin, AG and DAG levels were observed for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID).

CONCLUSIONS

This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free