Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of pitolisant in residual excessive daytime sleepiness for patients with obstructive sleep apnea adhering to continuous positive airway pressure therapy in the HAROSA studies: An individual patient meta-analytical approach

Testelmans D, Lehert P, Asin J, Imschoot J, Caussé C, Pépin JL

Sleep medicine, 2025

423 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is typically treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Some patients experience residual excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) under CPAP. Pitolisant demonstrated effectiveness in reducing EDS. An individual patient meta-analysis was conducted assessing the efficacy and safety of pitolisant 20 mg and 40 mg versus placebo to treat EDS in patients with OSA using CPAP.

METHODS: A study-patient, hierarchical, random-effects model was used. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Oxford Sleep Resistance test (OSLER) were co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included EDS-Z scores, fatigue, clinical global impression, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS: The searches identified three randomized controlled trials. Individual patient data were derived from 423 patients (placebo: n = 120, pitolisant 20 mg: n = 183, pitolisant 40 mg: n = 120). Treatment effects on ESS were -3.20 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.37, -2.00; P < 0.001) and -3.57 (95 % CI: 4.87, -2.80); P < 0.001) for the 20 mg and 40 mg doses, with corresponding standardized mean differences (SMD) of -0.71 (95 % CI: 0.45, -0.97) and -0.79 (95 % CI: 0.51, -1.08). Treatment effects in minutes for OSLER were 1.24 (95 % CI: 0.60, 1.10, SMD = 0.61; P = 0.001) and 1.21 (95 % CI: 0.06, 1.38, SMD = 0.51; P = 0.006). Pitolisant 40 mg was superior to the 20-mg dose for older age (≥50 years) and higher baseline apnea-hypopnea index values (≥15). No significant differences…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 423 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free