Evidence Hub

Neuromodulatory techniques in eating disorders: From electroconvulsive therapy to transcranial magnetic stimulation and beyond: A mixed method systematic meta-review

Longo P, Bevione F, Lacidogna MC, Lavalle R, Abbate Daga G, Preti A

Psychiatry research, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial and pharmacological interventions can effectively treat eating disorders (EDs), but improvements are often short-term and modest. Neuromodulation, altering nerve activity through targeted neurological stimulation, is an emerging intervention in neuropsychiatric disorders. This meta-review synthesizes evidence on neuromodulatory techniques in ED patients, identifying research gaps and future directions.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched using relevant terms.

STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS: Only systematic reviews or meta-analyses reporting on neuromodulatory techniques in ED patients were included. Three evaluators extracted data, resolving discrepancies with two experienced researchers. Study quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Defined outcomes and effect sizes were reported for systematic reviews, and pooled effect sizes and heterogeneity information for meta-analyses.

RESULTS: Eighteen systematic reviews (five meta-analyses) were included, with minimal primary study overlap (<5%). Most focused on anorexia nervosa (AN), some on treatment-resistant cases, and others on bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED). The quality of most systematic reviews was critically low, and they often combined observational studies with randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) showed promising results in RCTs,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free