Evidence Hub

Prevalence of vascular complications in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Awad AA, Yappalparvi A, Khatib MN, R R, Kaur M, Srivastava M, Barwal A, Prasad GVS et al.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025

9 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) comprises connective tissue disorders associated with increased vascular complication risks. This meta-analysis assesses the prevalence of vascular complications in among patients with EDS.

METHODS: The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until November 2024. Observational studies reporting vascular complications in EDS were included. Data extraction included demographics, complication types, and study design, and quality assessment was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects models and I² statistics assessed heterogeneity, while Doi plots evaluated publication bias.

RESULTS: Of the 1,772 articles screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria, reporting various vascular complications in EDS. The overall pooled prevalence of vascular complications was 30.03% (95% CI: 15.00-51.07%). The prevalence for the vEDS subtype was 42.36% (95% CI: 12.63-78.88%), for unspecified EDS was 18.65% (95% CI: 5.38-48.03%), and for hEDS was 19.77% (95% CI: 15.09-25.16%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the pooled prevalence estimates, and DOI plots indicated minimal publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the high risk of vascular complications in vEDS, with moderate involvement in other EDS subtypes. Regular vascular monitoring, especially in vEDS, is crucial for early detection and intervention.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free