Evidence Hub

Bone Fragility in Hereditary Connective Tissue Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Charoenngam N, Rittiphairoj T, Ponvilawan B, Jaroenlapnopparat A, Waitayangkoon P, Suppakitjanusant P, Prasitsumrit V, Pongchaiyakul C et al.

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2023

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate bone fragility in patients with hereditary connective tissue disorders (HCTD), including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Marfan's syndrome (MFS) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS).

METHODS: From inception to June 2022, potentially eligible studies were identified in the Medline and EMBASE databases using search strategy that included terms for "HCTD", "Fracture" and "Osteoporosis". Eligible studies must consist of a group of patients with HCTD and report prevalence/incidence of fracture/osteoporosis in their participants, with or without comparison with healthy individuals. Point estimates with standard errors were obtained from each study and combined using the generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS: Among the 4206 articles identified, 19 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of fracture in EDS, MFS, and LDS were 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 65%, I2 88%), 17% (95% CI, 11% to 26%, I2 68%), 69% (95% CI, 47% to 85%, I2 83%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in EDS was 17% (95% CI, 8% to 34%, I2 96%). EDS was associated with fracture [pooled odds ratio {OR} 4.90 (95% CI, 1.49 - 16.08, I2 86%)], but not osteoporosis [pooled OR 1.34 (95% CI, 0.28 - 6.36, I2 87%). One study reported a 5% (95% CI, 3% to 8%) prevalence of osteoporosis in MFS, which was associated with fracture [incidence rate ratio 1.35 (95% CI, 1.18 - 1.55)] and osteoporosis [subhazard ratio 3.97 (95% CI, 2.53 - 6.25)].

CONCLUSION: EDS was associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free