Evidence Hub

Antibiotics to prevent infection of simple wounds: a meta-analysis of randomized studies

Cummings P, Del Beccaro MA

The American journal of emergency medicine, 1995

1,734 participants

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether prophylactic systemic antibiotics prevent infection in patients with nonbite wounds that are managed in the emergency department (ED). A literature search was performed to identify published, randomized trials of prophylactic antibiotics for nonbite wounds. Blinded review of trial methods was used to select trials that randomly assigned patients to antibiotic or control groups and analyzed results by intention to treat. Of 9 randomized trials, 7 (with 1,734 study subjects) were accepted for analysis. The odds ratio for infection in treated patients compared with controls was used as the measure of effect, and a summary odds ratio was calculated. Patients treated with antibiotics had a slightly greater incidence of infection compared with untreated controls: odds ratio 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 1.78). Even among patients treated with a penicillinase-resistant antibiotic (5 trials with 1,204 patients), there was no benefit from treatment; odds ratio 1.00 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.71). In conclusion, there is no evidence in published trials that prophylactic antibiotics offer protection against infection of nonbite wounds in patients treated in EDs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,734 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free