Evidence Hub

Screening accuracy of the eating disorder examination questionnaire: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Park SH, Kim SY

Eating behaviors, 2026

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the screening performance of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE‑Q) for identifying eating disorders (EDs). Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycArticles. The screening accuracy of the EDE‑Q was compared with that of short-form versions, and subgroup analyses were conducted. A total of 18 studies were included. The full EDE‑Q demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), respectively. Short-form versions had a pooled sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84) and a pooled specificity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89). Subgroup analyses indicated the highest accuracy for bulimia nervosa among ED types. Sensitivity was higher in women than in men and in samples including adolescents (<20 years) than in those including participants aged ≥20 years. Sensitivity was also slightly higher in studies using the EDE as the reference standard compared with those using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases. The results show that the EDE‑Q demonstrates strong overall screening performance for EDs, with balanced sensitivity and specificity. It performed particularly well for bulimia nervosa and adolescents in the high-risk age group. The EDE‑Q may also be useful in community-based screening."

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free