Evidence Hub

Impulsivity-Related Traits in Eating Disorders With Self-Harm or Suicidal Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gemescu M, Giosan C, Barizi AMO, Petre CA, Gușoaie AA, Costache EL, Darabont AP, Neagoe TM et al.

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Although impulsivity is commonly associated with eating disorders (EDs) comorbid with self-harm, no prior reviews have investigated whether ED groups with co-occurring self-harm exhibit increased impulsivity-related traits.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the differences between ED groups with vs. without self-harm/suicidal behaviour, with respect to impulsivity-related domains.

Method: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched for comparative observational studies using electronic databases, reference lists, personal reference collection and requests sent to authors in the field for unpublished data. We included studies conducted from 1994 onwards that compared clinical ED groups with vs. without self-harm/suicidal behaviour on impulsivity-related domains, as assessed using questionnaires. We used a two-stage screening process conducted by independent reviewers and the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool for risk of bias assessment. Results were synthesized narratively and quantitatively, using separate random-effects meta-analyses for each impulsivity-related domain.

Results: According to meta-analytic results, clinical ED groups with self-harm/suicidal behaviour exhibited significantly increased scores on Negative Urgency (k = 10, g = 0.55), Lack of Premeditation (k = 8, g = 0.34), Lack of Perseverance (k = 8, g = 0.20) and Sensation Seeking (k = 8, g = 0.10). Only two studies assessed Positive Urgency, both reporting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free