Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Pitolisant for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Jalal AA, Hussain SI, Khan MS, Khan MS, Siddiqui E, Chandani HK, Karim AJ, Shakir S

The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2026

1,149 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of pitolisant, a selective histamine H₃ receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Data sources: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through August 2025 for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs).

Study selection and data extraction: Eligible RCTs reported Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) or Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), mean sleep latency, EQ-5D, or global impression outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias using Cochrane RoB 2.0. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test; certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE.

Data synthesis: Six RCTs (n = 1149) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, pitolisant significantly reduced Sleepiness Scale scores (SSS) (mean difference [MD] = -2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.62 to -2.33), increased mean sleep latency (MD = 3.06; 95% CI 2.12-3.99), and improved EQ-5D scores (MD = 2.68; P = 0.009). Patient global opinion (risk ratio [RR] = 1.40) and clinical global impression of change (CGI-C) (RR = 1.41) also favored pitolisant. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals were comparable with placebo, and common adverse effects, such as headache, insomnia, nausea, and anxiety, were infrequent and not significantly increased.

Relevance to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,149 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free