Evidence Hub

Piperacillin-tazobactam versus cefepime monotherapy in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fernandes BLG, Joseph A, Andriazzi VH

European journal of pediatrics, 2026

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether piperacillin-tazobactam therapy, compared with cefepime monotherapy, results in significant difference in treatment success, mortality, and duration outcomes in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to February 3. No starting limits for dates were used. We only included studies of pediatric patients with FN comparing piperacillin-tazobactam to cefepime monotherapy. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD). Five RCTs involving 470 episodes were included. The pooled analysis for treatment success showed no statistically significant difference between groups (RR = 1.02; 95% CI [0.89; 1.18]; P = 0.76) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%). No significant differences for mortality (RR = 2.09; 95% CI [0.62; 7.03]; P = 0.23; I2 = 0.0%). Duration of treatment was 0.9 day shorter for cefepime group (MD = 0.9 day; 95% CI [0.2; 1.6]; P 2 = 0%).

Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was found in treatment success or mortality between the groups. Patients receiving cefepime had a treatment duration 0.9 days shorter than those receiving piperacillin-tazobactam, although this finding should be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free