Evidence Hub

Interventions to reduce emergency department overcrowding and their effects on patient outcomes: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis

Alamri W, Aljuhani F, Alsharef N, Khayyat R, Shuaib M, Faheem T, Alsayed A

BMC emergency medicine, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) leads to inadequate patient outcomes and increased operational costs. These complications contribute to heightened stress on healthcare systems thus, effective methods to reduce ED overcrowding are necessary to improve patient flow and overall care quality. AIM: This mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of interventions such as Fast-Track, Team Triage, and Point-Of-Care Testing (POCT) in reducing ED overcrowding and improving patient flow metrics, including ED length of stay (LOS), wait times, and discharge times, to provide evidence-based recommendations for policy and practice in emergency healthcare. METHODS: This review complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar) were systematically searched for studies published between 2015 and 2025 assessing interventions to reduce ED overcrowding. A structured risk-of-bias assessment (RoB 2, ROBINS-I, JBI, MMAT) indicated overall acceptable methodological quality, with expected limitations related to non-randomized designs and limited blinding. Mean LOS was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis in RevMan, with heterogeneity assessed and secondary outcomes summarized narratively. This study is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO 2025: CRD42025634351). RESULTS: This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free