Evidence Hub

A Timely Update: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy for Non-Underweight Eating Disorders

Pellizzer ML, Zhou Y, de Valle MK, Linardon J, Wade TD

The International journal of eating disorders, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Objective: This umbrella review and meta-analysis synthesized recent evidence on the efficacy of psychotherapy for adults with non-underweight eating disorders (EDs).

Method: PsycINFO, Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing psychotherapy to treatment as usual (TAU) or control conditions in non-underweight adults with EDs (published January 2020-September 2025). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) for ED psychopathology and objective binge episode (OBE) frequency were pooled using second-order random-effects models. Subgroup analyses examined specific diagnoses and delivery format. Quality was assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Review (AMSTAR 2). Data were synthesized with Covidence and analyzed using R.

Results: Ten meta-analyses (71 RCTs) were included. Most participants were female, White, and diagnosed with bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder. Psychotherapy yielded significant medium-to-large improvements in ED psychopathology (SMD = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82, Q p = 0.79, I 2 = 0.0% [95% CI: 0.0%- 56.6%]) and OBE frequency (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.77, Q p = 0.40, I 2 = 4.5% [95% CI: 0.0%- 66.4%]) relative to TAU/control, with low heterogeneity. Effects were comparable across sub-group analyses. Nine of 10 meta-analyses were rated as critically low regarding confidence in results, as per the AMSTAR 2.

Discussion: Psychotherapy is efficacious for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free