Evidence Hub

Diagnostic performance of point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric skull fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wang X, Rao G, Yang G, Ye Y, Jiang X, Lin J, Tang M, Chen L et al.

The Journal of international medical research, 2026

Abstract

ObjectivePediatric head trauma is common, but computed tomography exposes children to ionizing radiation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric skull fractures and clarified its role as an adjunct to clinical assessment rather than a replacement for computed tomography when intracranial injury is suspected.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and bivariate random-effects diagnostic test meta-analysis guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Registration Number: CRD420251139217). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception through 3 September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted 2 × 2 diagnostic data, and assessed risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.ResultsNine studies conducted in emergency department settings met the inclusion criteria. Point-of-care ultrasound demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.94), specificity of 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.99), and an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.97). The summary positive likelihood ratio was 41.73 (95% confidence interval: 15.85-109.87), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.10 (95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free