Evidence Hub

Efficacy of pegfilgrastim in preventing febrile neutropenia during DCF chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hemdan K, El Tabakh RM, Elmezayen ZW, Yousef AM, Hussein A, Elghareab AM, Shehata MM, Ellethey AA et al.

Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2026

Abstract

BackgroundEsophageal cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy being a standard treatment option for locally advanced disease. However, DCF is associated with a high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), a serious complication that can lead to treatment delays, hospitalizations, and increased morbidity. Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is recommended for FN prevention, but its efficacy in esophageal cancer patients receiving DCF chemotherapy remains unclear.MethodsA systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science identified eligible studies. Retrospective and prospective studies comparing prophylactic pegfilgrastim with placebo or no G-CSF in patients undergoing DCF therapy were included. Eight reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The extracted data were then verified by two additional reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled effect sizes.ResultsPooled analysis showed that pegfilgrastim significantly reduced FN incidence (OR = 0.283, 95% CI: 0.102-0.782, p = 0.015). FN rates ranged from 3.3% to 30.8% in the pegfilgrastim group versus 26.7% to 60.6% in the control group. Pegfilgrastim was also associated with lower rates of severe neutropenia and shorter hospital stays, with no significant increase in adverse…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free