Evidence Hub

Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers in Hypertension Impact on the Effectiveness of Individualized Therapy: A Systematic Review

Silva AMPD, Torres EDS, Santos do Nascimento MDV, Franco JO, Amaral DC, Corin AS, Cavalcanti LB, Maia MBS et al.

Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2025

28 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Arterial hypertension affects >1.28 billion adults globally, remaining a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite effective therapies, suboptimal blood pressure control persists, highlighting the need for precision approaches. Epigenetic biomarkers, particularly DNA methylation (DNAm), have emerged as potential tools to enhance risk stratification and personalize antihypertensive therapy, yet their clinical relevance remains uncertain. To systematically synthesize evidence on genetic and epigenetic biomarkers associated with hypertension, focusing on DNAm signatures, regulatory pathways, and translational potential, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, registered in PROSPERO (Chronic Renal Disease (CRD) 420251059256). PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched up to March 2025. Eligible studies investigated genetic or epigenetic markers, such as DNAm, single nucleotide polymorphisms, or chromatin modifications in adult hypertension populations. Data on study design, populations, biomarkers, analytical methods, and outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. Twelve studies were included, encompassing cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. DNAm signatures at loci including AGTR1, PHGDH, SLC7A11, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE), and WNT3A…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free