Evidence Hub

Alterations in trimethylamine-N-oxide in response to Empagliflozin therapy: a secondary analysis of the EMMY trial

Aziz F, Tripolt NJ, Pferschy PN, Kolesnik E, Mangge H, Curcic P, Hermann M, Meinitzer A et al.

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2023

367 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not yet explored.

METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the EMMY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03087773), changes in serum TMAO levels were investigated in response to 26-week Empagliflozin treatment following an AMI compared to the standard post-MI treatment. Additionally, the association of TMAO changes with clinical risk factors and cardiorenal biomarkers was assessed.

RESULTS: The mean age of patients (N = 367) was 57 ± 9 years, 82% were males, and 14% had type 2 diabetes. In the Empagliflozin group, the median TMAO value was 2.62 µmol/L (IQR: 1.81) at baseline, 3.74 µmol/L (2.81) at 6 weeks, and 4.20 µmol/L (3.14) at 26 weeks. In the placebo group, the median TMAO value was 2.90 µmol/L (2.17) at baseline, 3.23 µmol/L (1.90) at 6 weeks, and 3.35 µmol/L (2.50) at 26 weeks. The serum TMAO levels increased significantly from baseline to week 6 (coefficient: 0.233; 95% confidence interval 0.149-0.317, p < 0.001) and week 26 (0.320, 0.236-0.405, p < 0.001). The average increase in TMAO levels over time (pinteraction = 0.007) was significantly higher in the Empagliflozin compared to the Placebo group. Age was positively associated with TMAO, whereas eGFR and LVEF were negatively associated with TMAO.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results are contrary to existing experimental studies that showed the positive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 367 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free