Evidence Hub

Micro-computed tomography for gunshot residue detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of distance-dependent deposition patterns

Vicentin-Junior CA, Vieira RB, Munhoz L, Watanabe PCA, Machado CEP, Martins-Filho PR

International journal of legal medicine, 2026

Abstract

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) has emerged as a non-destructive technique for three-dimensional visualization of radiodense gunshot residue (GSR), yet its quantitative performance and variability have not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized experimental evidence on micro-CT-based detection of inorganic GSR. Following PRISMA guidelines, six studies were included, of which four provided data for quantitative synthesis. Random-effects meta-analyses showed a progressive decline in detectable residue with increasing shooting distance, with pooled detection rates of 0.133% at 5 cm and 0.019% at 30 cm, accompanied by extreme between-study heterogeneity (I² > 99%). Quadratic mixed-effects meta-regression identified a significant nonlinear association between distance and detection, with a predicted maximum at approximately 17.79 cm, although distance explained only a small proportion of variability. Exploratory Gaussian modeling revealed marked substrate-dependent differences in detection profiles. Overall, micro-CT consistently enabled non-destructive three-dimensional localization and volumetric assessment of radiodense particles but showed limited capacity for standalone inferential applications, particularly shooting-distance estimation. These findings support its role as a complementary screening and mapping tool within forensic ballistic investigations while highlighting the need for standardized protocols and confirmatory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free